Professional Responsibility Related Question
What are professional standing that an engineer should stick to when he perceive there is serious inappropriate works were done and the safety and structural strength are at risk?
Introduction
Civil engineering project, both governmental related or
private sector ones, often involve huge amount of money. All projects initiated
and constructed therefore shall meet the intended use, benefit the public or
meet the requirement of the owner. Otherwise, it is waste of time, efforts and
money.
Engineers, both from consultancy team and contractor side,
are the ones playing the roles in ensuring quality of work to meet
specification, follow construction drawing and projects are completed within
schedule and budget.
Therefore, engineers shall play their role to safeguard
interest of their employer that works constructed products are safe and fit the
intended use with no or minimum unnecessarily maintenance works due to
inappropriate work method that could cause long term serviceability issues to
the building owners.
In other words, we shall have firm standing that the
interest of public and employers must be taken care. If there is inappropriate
and poor quality work done and not meeting the requirement, rectification and
reconstruction shall be instructed to contractor. Though this often cause
unpleasant situation because the risk of project delay and possible project
cost will be exceeded. However, our responsible and serious attitude will promote
healthy working environment and make the construction industry sustainable.
For instance, I have encountered poor quality work of one of
project that I have handled. The project is a factory and warehouse. There is
2-storey steel structure which is to support some numbers of heavy equipment on
both the 1st and 2nd floor. When all the steel main
framings were erected, we checked and inspected the bolt holes of almost all
beam are enlarged excessively both on the web of steel beam and the fin
(gusset). The edge and clearance between bolts are clearly not adequate. The
structural strength and bolt (plate) bearing capacity (on the connected steel
plate) are seriously jeopardized. Without further ado, we discuss to find
rectification work. Though the contractor at first is a bit reluctant because
of additional cost and delay in completion time, we as the engineers have
expressed our firm standing on quality and safe structure is priority.
Conclusion
In
working environment, there may be some situation make us hesitated to stand
firm of right and proper decision especially that may involve huge amount of
money. However, we shall be mature in thoughts. We shall play our roles as
engineers. For the above paragraph, our role is to ensure works that done are
safe and serve the intended use.
No comments:
Post a Comment