IEM Professional Interview
Section B - Questions on Regulation s on Professional Conduct
Question No. 13:
Essay 13: Ethical behaviour (project awards)
Assuming that you are
the principal partner of a reputable engineering-based firm in a small state in
the country. Your family is very well reputed, respected and influential,
having lived and worked in the state for decades.
Leaders of certain
political party approach you seeking your assistance to campaign for them in
the forthcoming state by-elections, they have promised to award your company
with all the major projects awarded by the state government. It is desirable for
your firm to secure new projects. Discuss critically on your actions, taking
account of the IEM’s regulations on Professional Conduct.
(The following write-up was prepared (written) by Mr. BAY prior to his sitting for PI on Feb 2014. It is shared here for reference of other candidates.)
Introduction
Engineer,
when called upon to give opinion, shall give opinion that is reliable. Prior to
any statement made, he shall ensure his qualification to make such statement.
No one shall benefit from his statement with prospect and fair treatment
deserved by others being scarified.
For
the scenario, which I were principal partner of a reputable engineering-based
firm and my family was well reputed, respected and influential in the small
state, I believe the respect and credits to our family are due to genuine and
honest contribution from all family members since decades. As an engineer, I
presume the respect earned from genuine efforts and contribution to public
services, design, buildings of public amenities to the small state.
Hence,
I shall continue to take the interest and benefit of community as the priority.
In the same time, I shall not scarify the dignity of the engineering profession
and company.
In
other words, I will reject the invitation of errant leaders of political
parties to assist them in campaigning in the coming state by-election in order
to secure major projects after election.
Uphold the dignity of profession
The
dignity of the profession of engineer shall be upholded. We shall not campaign
for the any political party with the name of well-known engineer and his
reputable firm. Engineers are to provide professional services and accept remuneration
for services rendered by them.
All
engineers shall not exchange the dignity of the profession for his own benefits
but harming the image of the profession.
Maintain company image and interest of fellow partners
For
the scenario, which I were the principal partner of reputable engineering-based
firm, I have duty and responsibility to safeguard interest of fellow partners
and all staffs too. Though the firm desires to secure new projects, the project
shall be obtained via ethical appropriate channel such as via open bidding
process. This should be the successful secret of the firm to-date.
All
fellow partners also have high standard of ethical behavior and competent. They
are definitely not supporting to secure new project via supporting errant
leaders of political party. If I choose to support the errant political
leaders, the company image and interest of fellow partners could be jeopardized
because voters definitely reject errant political leaders and unethical
approaches.
Do not jeopardize the prospect of other fellow
engineers
All
projects, especially government initiated for the benefits of nation and
people, shall only awarded via competitive and open bidding process. For the
scenario, which I were already principal partner of a reputable engineering
firm, I presume I should already an elder engineer in the industry. Therefore,
it is reasonably that both my firm and I do not jeopardize fair opportunity to
other fellow engineers.
All
engineer with appropriate competency and skills shall be given chances to
secure the projects. In the long run, all engineers will become more competent
and it is definitely good for the industry, profession and public.
Contribute to sustainable development of the
profession
All
benefits obtained via inappropriate and unethical approaches are short term and
not sustainable. Both inappropriate and unethical approaches, may in short
period, make oneself gain. However, it is damaging both the individual and
others in the industry because there could be many to follow unethical
approaches. If this situation happens, the profession will become unattractive
and not sustainable.
Be integrity and competent
Engineers’
works often involve millions of ringgits. The works are often related to
benefits of public, nation and clients. Hence, we shall be integrity and
transparent in both implementation of project and efforts to secure projects.
With integrity, only public will perceive engineers are competent and not
errant.
Accept remuneration from employer for services
rendered
Engineers
accept remuneration for professional services, for their competency and
professional services, rendered to clients. They only take responsibility that
they are confident to discharge.
The
errant leaders of political party, though make promise to award major projects
upon winning the by-election, are not client to engineers. The administrator of
the major projects is government, which are elected representatives by people.
The clients are the government and people.
Should
my firm was chosen for the major projects, it is remuneration for services
rendered.
Make reliable public statement and relevant with qualification
Engineers
are professional people with technical qualification and competency. He shall
not make public statement which he is not deemed the qualified and suitable
person to make. He shall not wrongfully make statement that resulted public
perception that his fellows, company and all association memberships that he
may have linked to backup and support of his statement. If he does otherwise,
no one indeed will benefit but creation of bad image to his own and
others.
Do not improperly solicit work
By
assisting the errant leaders of political party and in return for award of
major project, in my opinion, is improper act to solicit works too. It is
because there is no ethical method to secure jobs and it can be considered
benefits accepted other than employers.
Both
the government and the people indeed, are the employers and clients, if the
projects awarded to engineers.
Conclusion
Though
it is desirable for a firm to secure projects, the process shall be transparent
and via competitive bidding process. Jobs awarded with hidden secrets and
unethical method will not be sustainable for the firm. It is because the firm
could have lost his competency. Furthermore, as an elder reputable engineer, he
has greater responsibility to show good sample to his peers for advancement of
the profession.
In
other words, I will reject the request of the errant leaders of political
party. If he is willing to listen, I will further advise them to listen to people
and sincerely to provide services to people. With that, only will they gain
victory in the by-election and supports from people.
do you have answer for Section B - Questions on Regulation s on Professional Conduct Question 7???
ReplyDeleteHi. thank you so much for sharing. Do you have sample answers for question 1, 7, 9, 11 and 12? Thanks. :D
ReplyDeleteyour grammar is confusing but i get what u mean xD
ReplyDeleteHow To Stop Snoring… [...]whenever that niche can be exciting to you, you can love this particular internet site[...]… https://westasianetwork.com/ashford-formula-saudi-arabia.php
ReplyDelete